首页> 外文OA文献 >Measuring soft-sell versus hard-sell advertising appeals
【2h】

Measuring soft-sell versus hard-sell advertising appeals

机译:衡量软卖和强卖广告的吸引力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The terms "soft sell" and "hard sell" are well known to advertising scholars and practitioners. Despite widespread use of these terms, generally accepted definitions do not exist. Attempts to measure soft-sell and hard-sell appeals have typically been unsophisticated, relying on a single item that classifies an ad into one category or the other. This study is designed to provide a deeper understanding of the concepts "soft sell" and "hard sell," and to examine whether they are better measured on a single dimension than on two distinct dimensions. The main objective of the study is to develop and validate a method for measuring soft-sell and hard-sell appeals. To this end, candidate items were generated via a review of prior literature, supplemented by content analysis, a free-association task, expert judgment, and focus groups. The measurement instruments were then purified and validated using a pretest with a sample of student participants, and further validated using a general consumer sample. Results indicate that soft-sell appeals can be measured using a 12-item, 3-factor index, whereas hard-sell appeals can be measured using a 15-item, 3-factor index.
机译:广告学者和从业人员众所周知,术语“软销售”和“硬销售”是众所周知的。尽管广泛使用这些术语,但不存在公认的定义。通常,依靠一种将广告分类为一个类别或另一个类别的项目,来衡量软销和硬销上诉的尝试通常并不复杂。本研究旨在提供对“软销售”和“硬销售”概念的更深刻理解,并检查相对于两个不同的维度,它们在单一维度上的度量是否更好。该研究的主要目的是开发和验证一种用于评估软销和硬销上诉的方法。为此,通过对现有文献的回顾来生成候选项目,并辅以内容分析,自由交往任务,专家判断和焦点小组。然后使用学生参与者样本的预测试对测量仪器进行纯化和验证,并使用普通消费者样本进行进一步验证。结果表明,可以使用12个项目的3因子指数来衡量软销售上诉,而可以使用15个项目的3因子指数来衡量硬销售上诉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号